“No matter what Bob Dylan has done… or what he will do for the rest of his life, his obituary has already been written: ‘Bob Dylan, best known as a protest singer from the 1960s, died yesterday…’” That line, from Greil Marcus’s excellent essay on Masters of War, is one of my favourite observations about Dylan, and it came to mind again this week when the 70-year-old singer toured China for the first time. On Radio 4’s Today programme, they played Blowin’ in the Wind and spoke to a Chinese fan who said he loved Dylan because he sang songs of peace. It was as if the last four-and-a-half decades had never happened, and Dylan was still the skinny guy with the harmonica on stage telling the world that the times they were a-changin’.
Well, the times went and a-changed for Dylan, several times, but it was the singer’s misfortune to arrive in China the same week the authorities arrested dissident artist Ai Weiwei. To human rights advocates, Dylan was suddenly meant to turn back into the protest singer he used to be and take a stand. “It’s shocking to see him collude in this kind of censorship,” said Brad Adams of Human Rights Watch. “Back in the day, if he had been in Ai’s shoes, he would have expected someone to speak up for him. What does he have to lose?” Newspapers noted, disapprovingly, that he had had his setlist vetted by the Chinese authorities. (Given Dylan’s famously unpredictable live form, I wonder if they also ordered him to play the songs properly: “Just like on the albums please, Mr Dylan.”)
So even though he played some songs that are often considered broadly (albeit sometimes cryptically) political, like Ballad of a Thin Man (beloved of the Black Panthers back in ’66), A Hard Rain’s A-Gonna Fall, Desolation Row, Like a Rolling Stone and All Along the Watchtower, reporters bemoaned two omissions: Blowin’ in the Wind (which he last played in Taiwan on Tuesday) and The Times They Are A-Changin’ (California, August 2009). After Beijing and Shanghai last week, he plays Hong Kong on Tuesday and Wednesday but don’t hold your breath. Critics also complained that he didn’t say anything between songs, but then he never does.
If it were U2 playing China, having agreed not to perform Pride, Sunday Bloody Sunday or Walk On, then the critics would have a point. They still align themselves with resistance movements and political prisoners and therefore probably wouldn’t accept the booking in the first place. But Dylan made things perfectly clear back in 1964 when he told the New Yorker: “Me, I don’t want to write for people anymore. You know – be a spokesman.” The only time I can remember him saying about China was a surreal 1966 Playboy interview in which he jokingly challenged Chairman Mao to a fistfight.
By then, he had rejected explicit protest songs. His only relapses for leftist causes were 1971’s George Jackson and 1975’s Hurricane, while 1983’s Neighbourhood Bully, a stout defence of Israeli foreign policy released during his born-again Christian phase, was political in a direction that few of his old 60s fans expected or enjoyed. This is a man who couldn’t even be persuaded to publicly criticise the war in Vietnam, for God’s sake. In the summer of 1968, when the anti-war movement was gearing up for the Democratic National Convention in Chicago, he defended a friend who supported the war by telling a surprised interviewer, “People have their views. Anyway, how do you know that I’m not, as you say, for the war?”
But just as Joan Baez is still asked by some grey-haired protesters whether “Bobby” will be joining at her at the latest demonstration, his past won’t let him go. Do I wish he’d said something about Ai Weiwei, simply out of support for a fellow artist? Of course. Am I surprised he didn’t? Hell no. As David Aaronovitch put it in a smart Times (£) comment piece, “As Amnesty and Human Rights Watch have commented, the silence from the West over the latest crackdown has been deafening. Why would Dylan be prepared to do stuff that we aren’t? But he’s 70 and doesn’t need the money and his words conceivably might make a difference.”
One song in his Beijing setlist contains a neat, if unintended historical lesson. At the 1965 Newport folk festival, where he famously enacted his divorce from the veteran left-wing folkies who had fallen for him so hard, he played a reluctant encore featuring the tartly titled It’s All Over Now, Baby Blue. The idea that Dylan is the man to speak out on righteous causes — the rock star as noble activist — should be all over now. It should have been for 46 years. But still it endures. Bob Dylan, best known as a protest singer from the 1960s, has no say in the matter.
Note: For more on Ai Weiwei’s life and career, this New Yorker article from May 2010 is unbeatable.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.